MAGA Minds

Christian Nationalism, Neo-Fascism & The Denial of Pluralism

Photo by Mike Newbry on Unsplash

In the clinical consulting room, the “symptom” is rarely the root problem; it is a survival strategy—a pattern adopted and reinforced because it serves psychological needs, not an involuntary response beyond the person’s control. When we scale this perspective to the societal level, the intersection of Christian Nationalism and neo-fascism emerges as a shared psychological defense designed to shield the collective ego from the complexities of a pluralistic world. This defense has found its literal “treatment plan” in Project 2025, a blueprint intended to transition the nation from the “stress” of democratic ambiguity to the “relief” of authoritarian certainty.

Regression as a Strategy: The Myth of the Pure Past

A central tenet of both movements is the obsession with a “Golden Age” of conservative purity. Psychologically, this represents a regressive strategy. When individuals feel their status, identity, or traditional hierarchies are threatened by rapid social change, they experience existential dread—a fear of ego-dissolution.

The demand to “take the country back for God” functions as a rigid container for a fractured collective identity. Project 2025 codifies this by proposing the erasure of terms like “gender,” “diversity,” and “reproductive rights” from federal law. By removing the language of difference, the administration attempts to surgically remove the reality of it. This is the strategy of active denial: if the word no longer exists in the state’s lexicon, the painful truth of a changing world can be safely ignored.

The Narcissistic Demand: Schedule F & Symbiosis

In psychotherapy, we often observe the “narcissistic demand” for an environment that serves only as a mirror to the self. Any independent thought or dissenting data is experienced as a “narcissistic injury” that must be purged to maintain the leader’s illusion of omnipotence.

The implementation of Schedule F—the reclassification of tens of thousands of civil servants to allow for their replacement by loyalists—is the systemic version of this strategy. By gutting what they call the “Deep State” (independent experts and institutional memory), the administration seeks a symbiotic relationship with the government. In this state, the boundary between the leader’s will and the law is dissolved. This is a hallmark of neo-fascist consolidation: the state ceases to be a functional, objective tool and becomes a direct extension of the leader’s ego.

Externalizing the Superego: The Strongman & Righteous Violence

Both ideologies rely on the archetype of the Strongman—a paternal figure who promises order through “righteous violence.” This is the strategy of externalizing the superego. Adherents abdicate their moral agency to an external authority who provides absolute rules, effectively bypassing the “sin of empathy” for those outside the circle.

Project 2025’s push for a “biblically-based” definition of family and the redirection of federal funds toward religious organizations institutionalizes this Patriarchal Authoritarianism. It resolves collective “father hunger” by imposing a hierarchy where the “righteous” are protected and the “deviant” are punished. This structure removes the burden of individual conscience, replacing it with a mandated, state-sanctioned morality that mirrors the control of an overbearing parental (Daddy) figure. This is how Christian Nationalist theologians and members of paramilitary units can avoid any personal responsibility and rationalize dehumanizing policies in their own minds.

Persecutory Anxiety & the “Acting Out” of the Hunter

Despite holding significant power, both movements thrive on persecutory anxiety—the belief that the in-group is a hunted minority under constant siege. This is a thought distortion, not a psychotic break: adherents have access to demographic data, electoral victories, and institutional control, yet they selectively interpret reality to maintain the narrative of victimhood. This cognitive distortion is chosen and cultivated because it serves as a moral justification for preemptive aggression perpetrated by figures like Pete Hegseth, Stephen Miller and Kristi Noem.

The move to utilize the military or paramilitary units for domestic law enforcement and mass deportations is the “acting out” of this distortion to “defend the homeland.” In clinical terms, when a person chooses to interpret progress or demographic shifts as persecution, they license themselves to become the hunter. This is not involuntary—it is a deliberate adoption of threat narratives that justify dominance. The deportation machine is more than a policy; it is a psychological “purge” designed to remove perceived toxins from the national body to restore a sense of internal “cleanness.” It is a form of cultural ethnic cleansing.

Understanding is Not Absolution

To be clear: understanding these psychological mechanisms is not absolution. Thought distortions are clinical phenomena, but they are also moral failures—failures to reality-test, to seek disconfirming evidence, to tolerate discomfort without externalizing it as violence. Christian Nationalists and neo-fascists are responsible for maintaining their own distorted thinking because it enables them to harm others while feeling righteous. The clinical lens reveals how moral accountability is evaded, not why it should be excused.

These are not people suffering from conditions beyond their control. They are people who have chosen—and continue to choose—cognitive patterns that protect their sense of superiority and entitlement. They reinforce these distortions through selective media consumption, in-group validation, and the active rejection of contradicting evidence. This is willful reality distortion in service of narcissistic power, and it demands full moral accountability.

Intervention Strategies for Containment

To stop this regime and reduce the damage it inflicts, we must treat the crisis as an acute psychological intervention. This requires strengthening the “containment” of the state: reinforcing the legal and bureaucratic guardrails that protect the civil service from narcissistic capture. We must also engage in reality-testing at the local level—investing in community-based education and local journalism to counter the state-sanctioned denial of pluralism. Reducing the damage requires us to protect the “vulnerable organs” of our democracy—validating marginalized communities—by building robust mutual aid networks that function outside the reach of the “Strongman” hierarchy. Only by proving that safety can exist without authoritarian control can we begin to dismantle the seductive power of this survival strategy.

The Doubt Deficit & the Path to Healing

As a therapist, I recognize that we cannot argue someone out of a survival strategy they are invested in maintaining; we must address the deeper fear that made the strategy necessary while holding them accountable for the choice to maintain it. Christian Nationalism and neo-fascism are symptoms of a deep, collective attachment trauma—a primal fear that there is “not enough” space, resource, or love for everyone.

Project 2025 is the manual for a nation perceived to be in a state of psychological collapse, choosing the “sedative” of absolute power over the “stress” of a complicated democracy. To heal, we must move beyond policy and address the psychological poverty that makes these rigid, exclusionary identities so seductive. But healing also requires accountability: those who choose distorted thinking to justify cruelty must be confronted with the human cost of their choices. Healing requires the cultivation of integrative complexity—the ability to see the others not as demons to be conquered, but as humans with whom we share a complex, often frightening, but ultimately interconnected reality.

---

Letters from a Psychotherapist is a reader-supported, ad-free publication. By subscribing, you directly help keep this content accessible to everyone, regardless of their financial situation, while also supporting my work. Thank you for reading and being part of this community.